Preventing conflict in 2018, 100 years after the Armistice

This week marks 100 years since the end of World War I. One hundred years since an armistice encouraged battling sides to lay down their arms and usher in peace.

Many of us — the lucky ones — still enjoy peace. We go to work, to school, to the playground, to shops and restaurants all with a sense of safety and security. But that is not the case for many people around the world. Wars still rage in Syria, Yemen and Iraq, and violent conflict mars communities in every region of the globe.

Also this week, world leaders are in France — site of the 1918 Armistice signing — for the Paris Peace Forum. They are marking the occasion, but also working to address the international tensions that cause unrest in our day and age, and the initiatives aimed at preventing them: cooperation to fight climate change, resource scarcity, globalization and technological disruptions; institutions to channel power rivalries and administer global public goods; justice to assuage grievances and frustration, regulation to address inequalities and abuses of power; and peace building and security.

I participated in the Forum yesterday with other colleagues from the World Bank and highlighted the plight of one group for whom conflict and fragility make worse an already tenuous situation: the world’s poor.

By 2030, as many as 50 percent of the world’s poor people could live in countries affected by fragility, conflict, and violence and the number of refugees and internally displaced persons is at the highest since World War II.

In an increasingly inter-connected world, where events that originate in one part of the globe can spread rapidly to others, these challenges threaten global efforts to reduce poverty and boost shared prosperity.

To address the challenges — in poor countries and increasingly in affected middle-income countries — those of us working on development, humanitarian and security solutions to fragility, conflict and violence are developing new approaches, including pivoting to prevention; deploying new tools, including through new financing instruments; and leveraging new partnerships to deliver more effectively in countries and communities. What does this look like?

We know from our flagship report with the UN, Pathways for Peace, that for every $1 invested in prevention, about $16 are saved down the road. Therefore, by focusing on prevention we can direct more of our resources to sustainable development outcomes, rather than continuously responding to emergencies. Today, we are operationalizing the findings from Pathways for Peace and investing more in addressing global risks — conflicts, natural disasters, famines and more — before they turn into full-blown crises.

We are using new tools to do this. One example is the Risk Mitigation Regime (RMR), which offers $1 billion in financing from the World Bank’s International Development Association (IDA) for programs that specifically target the factors that risk fueling conflict.

In Niger, for example, we are leveraging RMR financing to strengthen economic opportunities for youth and women in conflict-affected regions. Working closely with the government, we are improving rural transport infrastructure and sustaining road access for farming communities to markets. Through this project we aim to support the government in addressing regional imbalances and grievances around service delivery, promoting the peaceful management of resources, and improving the livelihoods of marginalized groups — all factors that can mean the difference between war and peace. In addition to Niger, we are leveraging RMR financing in Guinea, Nepal and Tajikistan.

Underpinning this new approach to conflict prevention and the tools we are using to make it work is the firm conviction that partnerships are essential and must be the new normal if we are to prevent conflict, build resilience, and sustain peace in an increasingly complex world. We are therefore reducing fragmentation and working closely with peace building, humanitarian and security actors in countries like the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) to deepen partnerships with organizations that are closest to the ground and can carry out conflict-sensitive programming.

In DRC, we are preparing to scale-up our engagement in conflict-affected North Kivu by building partnerships with the UN, and notably the MONUSCO peacekeeping mission, to help provide the logistics and security necessary for us to carry-out development support in the most challenging settings.

And work is ongoing in many other countries. Two World Bank-financed initiatives are being recognized during the Paris Forum: The Londo (‘Stand-Up’) Project in Central African Republic is providing temporary employment to vulnerable people throughout the country. And a report published in 2017, Securing Development: Public Finance and the Security Sector, developed by the World Bank in partnership with UNDPKO, proposes a framework for improved public expenditure management and policy to allow finance agencies and security and military officials to work together better on budget planning, public financial management, financial accountability, and oversight of defense, police, and criminal justice systems.

One hundred years after the end of World War I, despite much progress, the world still suffers from conflict.

We have a collective responsibility to promote peace and prosperity by committing to support our fellow citizens — increasingly the world’s poor — still caught in the web of fragility. At the World Bank, we are developing new initiatives, tools and partnerships to address the challenge. The Paris Peace Forum is a reminder, not just of the immense need, but that there is a global coalition of countries, organizations, businesses and citizens also working together in new ways to promote lasting peace.

Views expressed in this publication are the author’s and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Paris Peace Forum.

Franck Bousquet is the Senior Director of the World Bank’s Fragility, Conflict, & Violence Group (FCV). He assumed this position on July 1, 2017 to lead the implementation of the World Bank’s strategic approach to addressing FCV challenges, as well as support operational teams in maximizing development impact on-the-ground in close collaboration with partners. Mr. Bousquet brings several years of leadership experience on fragility and resilience related issues. Prior to his current position, Mr. Bousquet served as director in the World Bank’s Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region, where he led the Bank’s engagement with international partners to create the Global Concessional Financing Facility, an effort to address the impact of the Syrian refugee crisis and bridge the gap in humanitarian and development assistance by providing concessional financing to middle-income countries facing refugee crises. During his tenure in the World Bank, Mr. Bousquet also led reconstruction efforts in a number of countries, including in Gaza in 2014, and has worked across a range of sectors and conflict-affected states in Africa.




Better #governance for a world at peace. Visit:

Love podcasts or audiobooks? Learn on the go with our new app.

Recommended from Medium

The quiet Australians, and the larrikin-wowser nexus

Being a child asylum seeker in the UK

A child refugee holds a sign that says, “Are we refugees forever?”

Election interviews: Jonathan Elmer, Green Party

United Nations Public Service Awards (UNPSA) 2020

South Sudan Plans To Double Oil Production

Centurion to manufacture hard hats in Saudi Arabia

The Cannabis Industry And Post Covid Recovery In Europe

On Student Unions

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store
Paris Peace Forum

Paris Peace Forum

Better #governance for a world at peace. Visit:

More from Medium

The inconvenient truth behind the Great Resignation: Modern day slavery

I was part of The Great Resignation, then I wasn’t.

I Work in Tech, and I Chose Italy Over the Bay Area.

Barbie is not a bad influence, here’s why